Keeping build output on one screen

When a build goes wrong, the amount of error messaging can easily scroll off the screen. Usually the error is on the first line reported. Here’s a couple ways to make it easier to read just the lines you want.

The first is just to grep for the word ‘error.’ This works for gcc:

make 2>&1 | grep error

Which produces

 
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:178:18: error: ‘name’ undeclared (first use in this function)
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:178:52: error: ‘fe’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘fd’?
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:179:9: error: ‘ndev’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘cdev’?
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:179:37: error: ‘dev’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘cdev’?
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:182:17: error: ‘rc’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘rq’?
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:187:20: error: ‘idx’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘ida’?
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:190:24: error: ‘STATE_IDLE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘VTIME_IDLE’?
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:193:34: error: ‘mctp_serial_tx_work’ undeclared (first use in this function)
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:197:17: error: label ‘free_netdev’ used but not defined
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:183:17: error: label ‘free_ida’ used but not defined
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:199:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type]

A bit of background…all Linux processes have 3 file descriptors (FD) by default. STDIN is for reading in information from other processes. STDIN is file descriptor 0. STDOUT is for, well, STANDARD’ output, or the output that the program is supposed to produce. STDOUT is FD 1. STDERR is for output that is not standard, and is intended for error messages. STDERR is FD 2.. Make and GCC spit their output into STDERR. The trick is to tell the program to redirect standard error into STDOUT via the magic symbol 2>&1. I read this in my head as “two goes into ampersand one.” STDERR is 2, STDOUT is 1.

If you want to get just the first set of line you can use the head command like this:

make 2>&1 | head -10

Which produces

make -C /lib/modules/6.2.0+/build M=/root/devel/mctp_pcc modules
make[1]: Entering directory '/root/devel/linux'
  CC [M]  /root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.o
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c: In function ‘create_mctp_pcc_nnetdev’:
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:178:18: error: ‘name’ undeclared (first use in this function)
  178 |         snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "mctpipcc%x", fe);
      |                  ^~~~
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:178:18: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
/root/devel/mctp_pcc/mctp_pcc.c:178:52: error: ‘fe’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘fd’?
  178 |         snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "mctpipcc%x", fe);

This gets just the first 10 lines…use a different number if you want a different amount of output

These two options are fairly easy to type and thus don’t really call for scripting. As the amount of filtering gets longer,. you make want to make scripts that build up more complex selection of the output.

If you have control of your makefile, you can use the -Wfatal-errorsflag as is written up here, but I am calling into precanned Makefiles and it drops the flag. To modify Makefiles see this discussion.


Vector Multiplication Using the Neon Coprocessor instructions on ARM64

Last post I showed how to do multiplication for a vector of integers using ARM64 instructions. Lots of use cases require these kinds of operations to be performed in bulk. The Neon coprocessor has instructions that allow for the parallel loading and multiplication of numbers. Here’s my simplistic test of these instructions.

Continue reading

Agile is not agile

Based on previous experiences, I would be hard pressed to join a team that has Scrum masters.

I expect that my previous experience was extreme, but not outside expectations for an organization that felt the need to officially embrace Agile(tm) and the concept of agile practitioners as part of the development process. It has been a bit over a year, and my frustration at the process has had a bit of time to settle, but I still feel my virtual hackles rise up when I think about the process.

Continue reading